io.aviso/rook¶
Easier Routing for Pedestal¶
Rook is a way of mapping Clojure namespaces and functions as the endpoints of a Pedestal application.
Using Rook, you map a namespace to a URI; Rook uses metadata to identify which functions are endpoints. It generates a Pedestal routing table that you can use as-is, or combine with more traditional routing.
With Rook, your configuration is both less dense and more dynamic, because you only have to explicitly identify your namespaces and Rook finds all the endpoints within those namespaces.
Rook is also designed to work well the Component library, though Component is not a requirement.
Rook generates a set of table routes that can then be used by the io.pedestal.http/create-server bootstrapping function.
(require '[io.aviso.rook :as rook]
[io.pedestal.http :as http])
(def service-map
{:env :prod
::http/routes (rook/gen-table-routes {"/widgets" 'org.example.widgets
"/gizmos" 'org.example.gizmos}
nil}
::http/resource-path "/public"
::http/type :jetty
::http/port 8080})
(defn start
[]
(-> service-map
http/create-server
http/start))
Rook supports many more options:
- Nested namespaces
- Defining interceptors for endpoints
- Leveraging metadata at the namespace and function level
- Defining constraints for path parameters
License¶
Rook is released under the terms of the Apache Software License 2.0.
Defining Endpoints¶
The io.aviso.rook/gen-routes
function is provided with namespaces; the actual
endpoints are functions within those namespaces.
Rook identifies functions with the metadata :rook-route. Functions with this metadata will be added as endpoints.
Here’s an example namespace with just a single endpoint:
(ns org.example.widgets
(:require [ring.util.response :as r])
(defn list-widgets
{:rook-route [:get ""]}
[]
(r/response {:widgets []})
Endpoint functions take some number of parameters (more on this shortly) and return a Ring response map.
This is a placeholder: it returns fixed and largely empty Ring response. In a real application, the function could be provided with a database connection or some sort and could perform a query and return the results of that query.
Note
Pedestal route matching is very specific: the list-widgets
endpoint above is mapped to /widgets
,
and a client that requests /widgets/
will get a 404 NOT FOUND response.
Rook Routes¶
The route meta is either two or three terms, in a vector:
- The verb to use, such as :get, :post, :head, ... or :all.
- The path to match.
- (optional) A map of path variable constraints.
For example, we might define some additional endpoints to flesh out a CRUD API:
(defn get-widget
{:rook-route [:get "/:id" {:id #"\d{6}"}]}
[^:path-param id]
(r/not-found "WIDGET NOT FOUND"))
(defn update-widget
{:rook-route [:post "/:id" {:id #"\d{6}"}]}
[^:path-param id ^:request body]
(r/response "OK"))
The URI for the get-widget
endpoint is /widgets/:id
, where the :id
path parameter
must match the regular expression (six numeric digits).
This is because the namespace’s URI is /widgets
and the endpoint’s path is appended to that.
Likewise, the update-widget
endpoint is also mapped to the URI /widgets/:id
, but with the POST verb.
Because of how Pedestal routing is designed, a URI where the :id
variable doesn’t match the regular expression
will be ignored (it might match some other endpoint, but will most likely match nothing and result in a
404 NOT FOUND response).
This example also illustrates another major feature of Rook: endpoints can have any number of parameters, but use metadata on the parameters to identify what is to be supplied.
- :path-param is used to mark function parameters that should match against a path parameter.
- :request is used to mark function parameters that should match a key stored in the Ring request map.
Namespace Metadata¶
That repetition about the :id
path parameter constraint is bothersome.
Fortunately, Rook merges metadata from the namespace with metadata from the endpoint, allowing
such things to be just defined once:
(ns org.example.widgets
{:constraints {:id #"\d{6}"}}
(:require [ring.util.response :as r])
(defn list-widgets
{:rook-route [:get ""]}
[]
(r/response {:widgets []})
(defn get-widget
{:rook-route [:get "/:id"]}
[^:path-param id]
(r/not-found "WIDGET NOT FOUND"))
(defn update-widget
{:rook-route [:post "/:id"]}
[^:path-param id ^:request body]
(r/response "OK"))
Here, each endpoint inherits the :id
constraint from the namespace.
Nested Namespaces¶
Nested namespaces is relatively straight forward:
(rook/gen-table-routes {"/hotels" {:ns 'org.example.hotels
:nested {"/:hotel-id/rooms" 'org.example.rooms}}}
nil)
In this example, the outer namespace is mapped to /hotels/
and the nested rooms
namespace is mapped to /hotels/:hotel-id/rooms
... in other words, whenever we
access a room, we are also providing the hotel’s id in the URI.
Instead of providing the namespace, a namespace definition is provided, which includes the namespace and nested namespaces are packaged together. (being able to just provide the namespace is a convenience).
Namespace Inheritance¶
Nested namespaces may inherit some data from their containing namespace:
- :arg-resolvers - a map from keyword to argument resolver factory
- :interceptors - a vector of interceptors
- :constraints - a map from keyword to regular expression, for constraints
These options flow as follows:
At the function meta data, :arg-resolvers and :interceptors are handled uniformly, but :constraints overrides come from the third value in the :rook-route metadata.
In all cases, a deep merge takes place:
- nested maps are merged together, later overriding earlier
- sequences are concatenated together (using
concat
for sequences, orinto
for vectors)
This inheritance is quite useful: for example, the org.example.hotels namespace may
define a :hotel-id
constraint that will be inherited by the org.example.rooms namespace endpoints.
Interceptors¶
Pedestal is all about interceptors, they are integral to how Pedestal applications are constructed and composed.
Each endpoint function may define a set of interceptors specific to that function, using :interceptors metadata.
Interceptors may be inherited from the namespace and elsewhere.
Interceptor Values¶
The interceptor values can be any of the values that Pedestal accepts as an interceptor:
- An interceptor, as by io.pedestal.interceptor/interceptor.
- A map, which is converted to an interceptor
- A bunch of other things that make sense in terms of Pedestal’s deprecated terse routing syntax
Rook adds one additional option, a keyword.
The keyword references the :interceptor-defs option (passed to io.aviso.rook/gen-table-routes).
A matching value must exist (otherwise, an exception is thrown).
The value is typically a configured interceptor value.
Alternately, the value might be an interceptor generator: a function with metadata :endpoint-interceptor-fn.
Interceptor Generators¶
An interceptor generator is a function that creates an interceptor customized to the particular endpoint.
It is passed a map that describes the endpoint, and returns an interceptor.
The endpoint description has the following keys:
- :var
- The Clojure Var containing the endpoint function.
- :meta
- The metadata map for the endpoint function.
- :endpoint-name
- A string version of the fully qualified name of the var
In this way, the interceptor can use the details of the particular endpoint to generate a custom interceptor.
For example, an interceptor that did some special validation, or authentication, might use metadata on the endpoint function to determine what validations and authentications are necessary for that particular endpoint.
For example, part of Rook’s test suite, uses this Interceptor generator:
(ns sample.dynamic-interceptors
(:require [io.pedestal.interceptor :refer [interceptor]]))
(def endpoint-labeler
;; Note the distinction: this puts the meta data on the function itself, not the Var referencing the
;; function.
^:endpoint-interceptor-fn
(fn [endpoint]
(interceptor {:name ::endpoint-labeler
:leave (fn [context]
(assoc-in context
[:response :headers "Endpoint"]
(:endpoint-name endpoint)))})))
Applying Interceptors¶
When a namespace provides :interceptor metadata, that’s a list of interceptors to add to every endpoint in the namespace, and in any nested namespaces.
This can cast a wider net than is desirable.
However, each individual endpoint will ultimately end up with its own individual interceptor list.
Further, none of those interceptors will actually execute in a request unless routing selects that particular endpoint to handle the request.
The default interceptors are usually provided by io.pedestal.http/create-server. These cover a number of cases such as handling requests for unmapped URIs, logging, preventing cross-site scripting forgery, and so forth.
The :interceptor metadata in namespaces and elsewhere simply builds up the Endpoint’s Interceptors stage.
Asynchronous Endpoints¶
There isn’t much to say here: an endpoint can be asynchronous by returning a Clojure core.async channel instead of a Ring response map.
The channel must convey a Ring response map.
Really, Pedestal takes care of the rest.
Argument Resolvers¶
In Rook, endpoint functions may have many parameters, in contrast to a traditional Ring handler (or middleware), or a Pedestal interceptor.
Argument resolvers are the bridge between the Pedestal context and the individual parameters of an endpoint function.
The :arg-resolvers option is a map from keyword to argument resolver generator.
When a parameter of an endpoint function has metadata with the matching key, the generator is invoked.
The generator is passed the parameter symbol, and returns the arg resolver function; this function is passed the Pedestal context and returns the argument value.
By convention, when the metadata value is true, the symbol is converted to a keyword.
So, if an endpoint function has a parameter ^:request body
, the :request argument resolver
will return a function equivalent to:
(fn [context]
(let [v (get-in context [:request :body])]
(if (some? v)
v
(throw (ex-info ...)))))